Dolores, a 45-year-old mother, has raised her grandson, Jackson, for 13 years after her daughter, Emma, wasn’t ready to be a mother. Now, following a difficult divorce, Emma wants full custody of Jackson, claiming she’s finally ready to be a mom. Dolores is torn between supporting Emma’s wish to reconnect with her son and protecting Jackson from potential emotional harm. In this letter, Dolores shares her struggle to balance love for her daughter with the responsibility she feels for her grandson’s well-being.
You are absolutely doing the right thing for Jackson. He's 13 and that's a rough age as it is this decision should not be made lightly, I believe your daughter needs to prove herself not only to you but to Jackson as well. I think it would be the very best thing for all concerned, it's a very big step. Stand firm in your decision !! You are responsible for his well being, and this could be very traumatic for you and Jackson both.
Dolores, first and foremost, we want to acknowledge the deep pain and confusion you must be feeling right now. You’ve spent the past 13 years raising Jackson, stepping in when your daughter, Emma, was not ready to care for him. You’ve sacrificed your own time, energy, and emotional resources to make sure he grew up feeling loved and supported. Now, Emma’s sudden reappearance in Jackson’s life after her divorce, with her demands for full custody, has left you understandably hurt and worried. We can feel your frustration and betrayal, and it’s crucial to highlight that your emotions are valid—especially considering everything you’ve been through.
One of the central issues here is Jackson’s emotional well-being, which has always been your top priority. You’ve spent years being his constant caretaker, and now you’re understandably cautious about his future. The bond you share with him is built on a foundation of stability and love. You fear that if Emma takes him back too soon, Jackson could experience another round of emotional turmoil if she’s not as committed as she claims. Your concern for his well-being isn’t just about control; it’s about protecting him from potentially another abandonment. Jackson deserves a stable, loving environment, and he needs to be sure that Emma is truly ready to be his mother in a meaningful and lasting way.
It’s not unreasonable to ask Emma to prove her commitment before taking such a huge step. Family therapy isn’t just a hoop to jump through—it’s a process that can help both Emma and Jackson build a solid foundation of trust and communication. You’ve spent 13 years nurturing Jackson, and now, after all this time, it’s understandable to want reassurance that Emma is in this for the long haul. You’re not punishing her; you’re asking for evidence that she is emotionally prepared to support Jackson in a way she hasn’t in the past. Therapy could help them navigate the complexities of their relationship and offer Emma the opportunity to truly bond with Jackson before fully taking on the role of a mother.
At the same time, we can empathize with Emma’s frustration. She’s coming from a place where she feels she’s finally ready to step into her role as a mother after a painful divorce. Understandably, she wants to make up for lost time, and this desire to reconnect with Jackson is likely genuine. However, it’s important to consider whether her readiness is based on a sincere commitment or simply a reaction to the changes in her own life. Your request for therapy is not an attack on her, but rather an effort to ensure that Jackson’s needs are met and that any future decisions made are in his best interest—not just hers.
The challenge you face now is one of balance—how to protect Jackson’s emotional well-being while also supporting Emma’s desire to be a mother. It’s clear that you want to give Emma the opportunity to prove herself, but you also want to avoid putting Jackson through any more instability. The therapy condition isn’t about punishing Emma; it’s about giving her the chance to show that she’s truly ready to step into this role and that she’s committed to the relationship long-term. In this situation, your protective instincts are vital, and it’s okay to prioritize Jackson’s emotional health over the pressure to simply “give her a chance.”
Dolores, you are not the villain here. Your instincts as a mother are spot-on—protecting Jackson and ensuring his emotional security should always be your primary focus. You’ve already given Emma many years to demonstrate her readiness, and now you’re asking for her to prove it in a way that will safeguard Jackson’s future. While it’s crucial to remain open to the idea of Emma becoming a consistent part of Jackson’s life, it’s also perfectly reasonable to ask for time and effort in building that relationship. We believe that the therapy request is a fair compromise, one that will allow Emma the opportunity to prove her commitment without risking Jackson’s emotional stability. Trust your judgment, and know that your commitment to Jackson’s well-being is both admirable and necessary.
Here’s another story of family conflict: a sister-in-law secretly conducts a DNA test on her niece, only to be caught off guard by the mother’s reaction. Read more.
