My Husband and I Wanted To Have an Open Relationship, but Neither of Us Could Have Predicted This Would Happen

Today’s letter from Jessica tackles a common dilemma faced by divorced parents—when financial responsibilities clash with new life plans. Her creative response to her ex-husband’s request to pause child support payments for a European vacation has sparked intense debate. How do we balance firm boundaries with compassionate co-parenting? As you read Jessica’s account and our response, consider what principles should guide decisions when a child’s needs conflict with adult desires. Jessica’s letter follows below.
I (36F) have been divorced from my ex-husband (38M) for four years. We have a daughter, Lily (8F), who primarily lives with me. Our divorce agreement stipulates that he pays $850 in monthly child support and gets visitation every other weekend.
My ex, let’s call him Mark, has always been... difficult. When we were married, he’d blow money on impulse purchases while I managed the budget. That habit hasn’t changed. He remarried last year to Jessica (29F), who seems nice enough but clearly enjoys the finer things.
Last month, Mark called me out of the blue, asking if we could “work something out” regarding child support. I assumed something serious had happened — job loss, medical bills, etc.
Ex-husband arrogantly asked to skip 5 months of child support to fund a lavish European vacation with his new trophy wife. On visitation day, instead of our daughter, I left an expensive suitcase at his door. His face drained of color seeing only a note that read: "Since you’d prefer to ’pause’ being a father for 5 months to vacation, here are 5 months of supplies Lily would need. You wanted to skip supporting her, so I figured you’d rather take care of these needs directly instead of paying me.
I had filled the suitcase with:
His face went through about five emotions in ten seconds. Then his phone started blowing up my phone:
Mark: “Where’s Lily??? What is all this?” Me: “That’s what your child support pays for. Lily is at my sister’s for the weekend.” Mark: “You can’t do this! It’s my visitation time!” Me: “And it’s your obligation to support your daughter. You made it clear your vacation is more important.”
He exploded, calling me “childish” and “spiteful.” Jessica got on the phone, crying about how they’d already put down deposits for hotels in Paris, Rome, and Barcelona. My sister later told me Mark showed up at her house demanding to see Lily (she didn’t let him in).
The next day, I received bank notifications for the next THREE months of child support payments deposited at once, along with a text: “Happy now? Don’t ever keep my daughter from me again.”
My mom thinks I taught him a valuable lesson about parental responsibility. My best friend says I went too far by using visitation as leverage and should have just taken him back to court. My brother thinks it was “savage but justified.”
So am I the bad guy for sending supplies instead of our daughter when he tried to skip child support payments?
Jessica, your letter struck a chord with our editorial team. The challenges of co-parenting after divorce are complex, especially when financial responsibilities come into question. Your creative response to your ex-husband’s request has sparked quite the debate among our readers and staff alike.
Child support isn’t optional, and it isn’t a courtesy. It’s a legal and moral obligation that reflects the ongoing responsibility both parents have toward their child, regardless of their relationship status. Mark’s request to “pause” child support payments for a vacation fundamentally misunderstands what these payments represent. They aren’t payments to you—they’re his share of Lily’s daily needs, education, healthcare, and development. Your itemized suitcase brilliantly illustrated this reality. The food, clothing, school supplies, and activity fees in that suitcase are the tangible embodiment of what $850 monthly actually covers. Many parents in your situation silently shoulder additional costs beyond the stipulated support amount, making his request even more problematic.
We understand why you chose this approach, Jessica. Traditional methods of handling support payment issues—like returning to court—are time-consuming, expensive, and don’t always create the immediate understanding that your “suitcase lesson” delivered. Your demonstration made abstract financial obligations concrete in a way few other approaches could have. However, withholding visitation, even temporarily, ventures into difficult territory legally and emotionally. While your sister’s house provided Lily with a safe environment during this conflict, using visitation as leverage can potentially backfire in future custody discussions. Court-ordered visitation schedules exist separately from financial obligations, and judges typically view them as distinct issues that shouldn’t be intertwined for leverage.
Вашей главной заботой в этой ситуации было, очевидно, благополучие Лили, как финансовое, так и эмоциональное. Дети выигрывают больше всего, когда оба родителя поддерживают с ними постоянные отношения, даже если эти отношения выглядят по-другому после развода. Напряжение между вами и Марком неизбежно влияет на Лили, даже когда взрослые изо всех сил стараются оградить ее от конфликта. Ваше быстрое разрешение ситуации, когда Лили остается с тетей, а не отменяет посещения полностью, показывает, что вы понимаете ее потребность в стабильности. Двигаясь вперед, найдите способы решения проблем родительской ответственности, не нарушая отношений Лили, что лучше всего послужит ее эмоциональному здоровью. Дети часто усваивают родительские конфликты, задаваясь вопросом, не являются ли они причиной, поэтому сохранение некоторой дистанции между разногласиями взрослых и ее отношениями с обоими родителями остается решающим.
The quick deposit of three months’ support payments suggests your message was received, perhaps more effectively than months of arguments or legal proceedings could have achieved. Now comes the challenging work of rebuilding functional co-parenting communication after this conflict. Your ex-husband’s text reveals both frustration and a priority—his relationship with his daughter. That priority is something you can work with. Consider proposing a more structured communication approach about financial matters, perhaps through a co-parenting app that documents agreements and expenses. This might prevent future impulsive requests while creating a record of your reasonable responses. Many families find that maintaining business-like communication about parenting responsibilities helps minimize emotional conflicts while ensuring children’s needs remain the focus.
We see a mother protecting her child’s interests with creativity and determination. Your approach was unconventional but effective in communicating an important message about parental responsibility. Going forward, the goal isn’t winning individual battles but creating a sustainable co-parenting relationship that serves Lily’s needs for the next decade and beyond. Consider this incident a reset button—Mark now clearly understands that child support isn’t negotiable based on his vacation plans, and you’ve demonstrated your willingness to take a stand when necessary. With this understanding established, perhaps you can work toward a co-parenting relationship with clearer boundaries and better communication.
After finally finding the strength to forgive her husband’s infidelity, a woman watched helplessly as his subsequent actions destroyed everything they had rebuilt... read more!